Sepulveda VS. Bartolome de Las Casas

The argument of Juan Gines de Sepulveda is that of negative feedback to what was experienced in the first fulfill cargon of the Spaniards and American Indians in the Sixteenth Century. Also, Sepulveda demonstrates through his opinion that state of war against the Indians is a rightful act due to the fact that the Indians are seen as lower beings. The proof that Sepulveda uses to support his position is the coup doeil the Spaniards noned in the short time they observed the Indians. Sepulveda plan that the Indians were ignorant individuals that were uncivilized in the way they conducted their lives. This can be seen in that Sepulveda comments on how Indians are non educated because they count not to have an alphabet, whatsoever knowledge of the sciences, or any means of preserving their history as the Spaniards do. Due to the reason of not spirit the ways of the Indians Spaniards much(prenominal) as Sepulveda came to conclusions that were unjust to the Indians. The Conqu istadors believed that the secondary men they encountered were pitiless in that for purposes of sacrifice the Indians killed their own volume by winning out their hearts and placing them on alters. Sepulveda sees this as disgusting and unsufferable for a human being.

In severalize to support his views Sepulveda turns to Aristotles doctrine of natural slavery and agrees that those to a greater end powerful are made to be masters to omit over the weak. Another point that is being discussed by Sepulveda is that of the Indians not being in charge of their own destiny, that they leave their lives to be ruled by their gods. This goes against all of the Conquistadors beliefs in Christ ianity and the confidence they contain in ! God. Sepulveda looks upon the Indians way of life, much(prenominal) as them not having their own land... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay